Status

  • Publicatie 8 Januari 2022

 

 

Nearly two years ago, I made a costly mistake. I’d spent some time trying to fix up my bike at a local bike co-op, when one of the volunteers told me that the chain was worn, and I should come back soon to replace it. A week later, the first lockdown began and I put the chain out of my mind. A few weeks later, it gave way beneath me and I found myself face down in a pool of my own blood.

Author: Tim Harford. Financial Times 

When I wrote about my mishap, I neglected to mention the most obvious lesson: replace your bike chain at the first sign of trouble. But I am not alone in that oversight. Maintenance is not sexy. When Stewart Brand devoted half an hour of TV to the subject — in the 1997 BBC series How Buildings Learn — he confronted the problem squarely. “People don’t want to do maintenance for perfectly understandable reasons,” he declared. “There’s nothing positive about it, just expense and hassle and nothing really gained.” Brand was speaking ironically. He knows what I learnt the hard way, that there is everything to be gained from timely maintenance.

 

Click to enlarge Asset Management BowTie Click to enlarge: See Body of thoughts AM-BowTie Click Here

 

So why do we neglect it? It’s a topic of discussion every time a bridge collapses in the US; the recent Forbes Avenue Bridge collapse in Pittsburgh is part of a trend, alas. A simple diagnosis is that politicians would rather save money now and leave their successors to deal with the consequences. (See also: pandemic preparedness; education spending; climate change.) Yet the rot runs deeper. Maintenance is a low-status affair: you can confess to being unable to change a tyre in a way that you would never confess to being unable to name a play by Shakespeare.


Maintenance requires diagnosis, judgment and improvisation. We can build robots that make dishwashers, but we can’t build robots that repair them

 

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/8025ae51-99c0-4cc2-bce7-21a74e89abf6

“I came into this game for the action,” says a gun-wielding, balaclava-wearing Harry Tuttle in Brazil. “Go anywhere, travel light, get in, get out, wherever there’s trouble.” Tuttle (Robert De Niro) is a rogue maintenance man, a heating systems engineer on the run from the authorities. The very idea is absurd, and that speaks volumes about how we view maintenance.

We understand the expertise of janitors, plumbers and mechanics, and we suffer mightily in their absence, yet somehow we take them for granted. We take for granted, too, the most basic maintenance of all — preparing food, washing clothes, changing dirty nappies. Nobody would boast at a dinner party or on a first date about doing any of this, yet it is essential.

Maintenance is so underrated that we don’t really know how much of a problem we have. In his book The Shock of The Old, David Edgerton writes, “Maintenance has lived in a twilight world, hardly visible in the formal accounts societies make of themselves. In the economic and production statistics, for example, it is invisible.” This is about more than breaking bridges and breaking bike chains. There is a missed opportunity here to find something rather wonderful in maintenance.

This is about more than breaking bridges and breaking bike chains. There is a missed opportunity here to find something rather wonderful in maintenance.

Full Article: Click Here

 

5.  React, Discuss & Article

 

Discuss or give your opinionFollow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

 

Related Articles 

 

 

 

Tags: